United States v. Taylor

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Taylor

489 F.2d 284

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 1973

DocketNo. 73-2071

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 489 F.2d 284 (United States v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Taylor, 489 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a conviction on an indictment charging appellant with having given a false name and address in purchasing a firearm. 18 U.S. C.A. §§ 922(a)6 and 924(a). The evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction. There was no variance between the indictment and the proof. There was no error in admitting the identification testimony of the seller of the firearm. There was no error in the charge to the jury as claimed nor in the procedure followed in reviewing the proposed charge.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a conviction on an indictment charging appellant with having given a false name and address in purchasing a firearm. 18 U.S. C.A. §§ 922(a)6 and 924(a). The evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction. There was no variance between the indictment and the proof. There was no error in admitting the identification testimony of the seller of the firearm. There was no error in the charge to the jury as claimed nor in the procedure followed in reviewing the proposed charge.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 F.2d 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-taylor-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack