United States v. Taylor

591 F. App'x 228
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
DocketNo. 13-7250
StatusPublished

This text of 591 F. App'x 228 (United States v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Taylor, 591 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Taylor’s conviction became final in 2008, and he filed his [229]*229§ 2255 motion in 2012. Under our recent decision in Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180 (4th Cir.2014) (en banc), Taylor’s § 2255 motion was untimely. We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deangelo Whiteside v. United States
775 F.3d 180 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
591 F. App'x 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-taylor-ca4-2015.