United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2024
Docket24-6512
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed (United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6512 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TAWFEEQ HAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cr-00385-RDA-1)

Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 27, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Michael Schlessinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6512 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed appeals the district court’s order denying

his second motion to terminate his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).

We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. See United States v.

Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (reviewing denial of § 3583(e)(1) motion for

abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We also deny

Mohammed’s motions for the appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government

expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. George Lloyd Pregent
190 F.3d 279 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tawfeeq-mohammed-ca4-2024.