United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2024·No. 24-6512·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TAWFEEQ HAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cr-00385-RDA-1)

Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 27, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Michael Schlessinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tawfeeq Hameed Abdullah Mohammed appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to terminate his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (reviewing denial of § 3583(e)(1) motion for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We also deny Mohammed’s motions for the appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed, (4th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed (United States v. Tawfeeq Mohammed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. George Lloyd Pregent
190 F.3d 279 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)