United States v. Tavares

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tavares. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 F.3d 10
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 5, 1998·No. 98-1093·Unpublished

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-1093

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

DANIEL D. TAVARES,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

Daniel D. Tavares on brief pro se. Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J. Pelgro, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition.

SEPTEMBER 28, 1998

Per Curiam. After careful review of the record, we agree that the district court properly dismissed appellant's Rule 35 motion as "utterly frivolous." Accordingly, the district court's order is affirmed. Appellant's motion to dismiss this appeal and motion to withdraw his motion to dismiss are moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tavares, (1st Cir. 1998).

United States v. Tavares (United States v. Tavares) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.