United States v. Tatum

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Tatum

677 F. App'x 140

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2017·No. No. 16-7712·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[141] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Torell Tatum appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tatum, No. 8:13-cr-00492-DKC-1, 2016 WL 6682651 (D. Md. Nov. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[141] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Torell Tatum appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tatum, No. 8:13-cr-00492-DKC-1, 2016 WL 6682651 (D. Md. Nov. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Tatum, 677 F. App'x 140 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

677 F. App'x 140 (United States v. Tatum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related