United States v. Tate

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 22, 2001
• Docket: 00-6700
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Panel rehearing granted and rehearing en banc denied by order filed 1/19/01. Unpublished opinion filed 8/7/00 is vacated. UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6700

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY TATE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-97-38-H, CA-99-437-5-H)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Tate seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Tate, No. CR-97-38-H; CA-99-

437-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED