United States v. Tarrats

639 F. App'x 950
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 13, 2016·No. No. 16-6089·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Tarrats, No. 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D.Va, Jan. 7, 2016; June 18, 2015); see also United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir.2013) (ac-. cording deference to a district court’s interpretation of its own judgment). We dispense with oral argument because the [951] facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tarrats, 639 F. App'x 950 (4th Cir. 2016).

639 F. App'x 950 (United States v. Tarrats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Mann
709 F.3d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)