United States v. Tarrats

639 F. App'x 950
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6089
StatusPublished

This text of 639 F. App'x 950 (United States v. Tarrats) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tarrats, 639 F. App'x 950 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Tarrats, No. 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D.Va, Jan. 7, 2016; June 18, 2015); see also United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir.2013) (ac-. cording deference to a district court’s interpretation of its own judgment). We dispense with oral argument because the [951]*951facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert Mann
709 F.3d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tarrats-ca4-2016.