United States v. Tarrats

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Tarrats

560 F. App'x 216

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2014·No. No. 14-6056·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct clerical error under Fed.R.Crim.P. 86. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Tarrats, No. 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D.Va. Dec. 23, 2013). We grant leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Tarrats appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct clerical error under Fed.R.Crim.P. 86. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Tarrats, No. 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-7 (E.D.Va. Dec. 23, 2013). We grant leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Tarrats, 560 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

560 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Tarrats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.