United States v. Tapia

115 F. App'x 755
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2004
Docket03-41364
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 F. App'x 755 (United States v. Tapia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tapia, 115 F. App'x 755 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Tapia pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Tapia contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 488, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Tapia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by this court’s precedent, United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review.

Tapia’s argument is foreclosed. Slaughter, 238 F.3d at 582; see United States v. Fort, 248 F.3d 475, 482-83 (5th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Tapia
157 F. App'x 736 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 F. App'x 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tapia-ca5-2004.