United States v. Tapia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 1, 2000·No. 99-41122·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-41122 Summary Calendar _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADRIANA TAPIA,

Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-135-2 _________________________________________________________________

October 27, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The federal public defender appointed to represent Adriana

Tapia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Tapia

received copies of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tapia, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Tapia (United States v. Tapia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)