United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And

262 F.3d 1033, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18832, 2001 WL 946197
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2001·No. 99-10463·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for rehearing except that it directs that two corrections pointed out in the petition be made:

At slip op. 6888, the first sentence in the second full paragraph is deleted and the following substituted in its stead:
“Lam was retried on the same indictment. The Government on December 18, 1998 filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty.”
At slip op. 6893, delete the text of footnote 7 and place in its stead:
“Staniels was appointed counsel from the Federal Defenders Office of the Eastern District of California.”

The clerk is directed to re-file the opinion with the indicated corrections.

Judges O’Scannlain and Gould vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge B. Fletcher so recommends.

The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court and no active member of the court has voted for rehearing.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And, 262 F.3d 1033, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18832, 2001 WL 946197 (9th Cir. 2001).

262 F.3d 1033 (United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawes v. Angol
D. Alaska, 2025
Bovensiep v. Dean Borders
S.D. California, 2020
United States v. Juan Reyes
Ninth Circuit, 2017
United States v. Gerardo Rios-Orozco
472 F. App'x 587 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Whitney v. State
2004 WY 118 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Clarence Kenneth Gorman
314 F.3d 1105 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Beydler
47 F. App'x 475 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Hoyt
47 F. App'x 834 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Minore
40 F. App'x 536 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Ricardo Murillo
288 F.3d 1126 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Ross v. Stewart
32 F. App'x 227 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)