United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And

262 F.3d 1033, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18832, 2001 WL 946197

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 22, 2001

Docket99-10463

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 262 F.3d 1033 (United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And, 262 F.3d 1033, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18832, 2001 WL 946197 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for rehearing except that it directs that two corrections pointed out in the petition be made:

At slip op. 6888, the first sentence in the second full paragraph is deleted and the following substituted in its stead:

“Lam was retried on the same indictment. The Government on December 18, 1998 filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty.”

At slip op. 6893, delete the text of footnote 7 and place in its stead:

“Staniels was appointed counsel from the Federal Defenders Office of the Eastern District of California.”

The clerk is directed to re-file the opinion with the indicated corrections.

Judges O’Scannlain and Gould vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge B. Fletcher so recommends.

The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court and no active member of the court has voted for rehearing.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI