United States v. Tamburello

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Tamburello

76 M.J. 61, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 145

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedJanuary 11, 2017

DocketNo. 17-0115/MC

StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 61 (United States v. Tamburello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Tamburello, 76 M.J. 61, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 145 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 201600109. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

[62]*62WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE INSTRUCTED THE MEMBERS, “IF BASED ON YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE, YOU ARE FIRMLY CONVINCED THAT THE ACCUSED IS GUILTY OF THE CRIME CHARGED, YOU MUST FIND HIM GUILTY.”

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 201600109. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

[62]*62WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE INSTRUCTED THE MEMBERS, “IF BASED ON YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE, YOU ARE FIRMLY CONVINCED THAT THE ACCUSED IS GUILTY OF THE CRIME CHARGED, YOU MUST FIND HIM GUILTY.”

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 M.J. 61, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tamburello-armfor-2017.