United States v. Tamaica Hoskins
This text of United States v. Tamaica Hoskins (United States v. Tamaica Hoskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 19-12803 Date Filed: 11/21/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 19-12803 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00507-MHT-WC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAMAICA HOSKINS,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama ________________________
(November 21, 2019)
Before WILSON, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal
waiver in Hoskins’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert,
997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced Case: 19-12803 Date Filed: 11/21/2019 Page: 2 of 2
if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Bascomb, 451
F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by
comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry,
399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes
waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant
error).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Tamaica Hoskins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tamaica-hoskins-ca11-2019.