United States v. Tallie

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Tallie

671 F. App'x 753

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 5, 2016·No. No. 15-15744 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tilden Haywood, appointed counsel for Anthony Tallie in this appeal from the denial of Tallie’s construed motion for a sentence reduction under Fed. R. Crim. P. [754]*75435(b), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Tallie’s motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tilden Haywood, appointed counsel for Anthony Tallie in this appeal from the denial of Tallie’s construed motion for a sentence reduction under Fed. R. Crim. P. [754]*75435(b), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Tallie’s motion is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Tallie, 671 F. App'x 753 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 753 (United States v. Tallie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related