United States v. Talamantes

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Talamantes

153 F. App'x 312

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 9, 2005·No. 05-50079·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cheyenne Talamantes raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Celestine, 905 F.2d 59, 60 (5th Cir.1990), which held that the Eighth Amendment does not bar the reincarceration of defendants who have violated the terms of their supervised release but who have already served the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the initial offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance *313 is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cheyenne Talamantes raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Celestine, 905 F.2d 59, 60 (5th Cir.1990), which held that the Eighth Amendment does not bar the reincarceration of defendants who have violated the terms of their supervised release but who have already served the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the initial offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance *313 is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Talamantes, 153 F. App'x 312 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

153 F. App'x 312 (United States v. Talamantes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related