United States v. Taiwan Lenard Driver

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Taiwan Lenard Driver

581 F. App'x 829

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 28, 2014·No. 14-11555·Unpublished

Opinion

*830 PER CURIAM:

Michael Cohen, appointed counsel for Taiwan Driver in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Driver’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*830 PER CURIAM:

Michael Cohen, appointed counsel for Taiwan Driver in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Driver’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Taiwan Lenard Driver, 581 F. App'x 829 (11th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

581 F. App'x 829 (United States v. Taiwan Lenard Driver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related