United States v. Tafolla-Ayala
This text of 176 F. App'x 745 (United States v. Tafolla-Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Guillermo Tafolla-Ayala appeals from his guilty plea conviction and 60-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Tafolla-Ayala has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Tafolla-Ayala has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 F. App'x 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tafolla-ayala-ca9-2006.