United States v. Sylvester Pryor

53 F.3d 332, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17674, 1995 WL 259221
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1995
Docket94-5761
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 F.3d 332 (United States v. Sylvester Pryor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sylvester Pryor, 53 F.3d 332, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17674, 1995 WL 259221 (6th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

53 F.3d 332
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sylvester PRYOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-5761.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 3, 1995.

Before: KENNEDY, KRUPANSKY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Sylvester Pryor, was convicted of three drug-trafficking crimes and use of a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. He appeals from the district court's refusal to suppress evidence of the crimes which was seized by law enforcement officers from an apartment. He also challenges the use of his prior criminal history for sentencing purposes, as he contends the government improperly withheld that history from his trial counsel.

Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully reviewed the record on appeal and studied the briefs of the parties, we find no merit in either contention.

Because the reasons the convictions and sentences should be upheld have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the district court in its Memorandum and Order filed March 15, 1994, and stated in open court on June 6, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sylvester Pryor v. United States
278 F.3d 612 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F.3d 332, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17674, 1995 WL 259221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sylvester-pryor-ca6-1995.