United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendon

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendon

331 F.2d 604, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1964

Docket15678

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 331 F.2d 604 (United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendon, 331 F.2d 604, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398 (6th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from a motion to correct the sentences imposed by the District Court upon appellants, and the Court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order denying the motion to correct the sentences heretofore imposed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of Judge Boyd, reported in 227 F.Supp. 1014 (W. D.Tenn.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from a motion to correct the sentences imposed by the District Court upon appellants, and the Court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order denying the motion to correct the sentences heretofore imposed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of Judge Boyd, reported in 227 F.Supp. 1014 (W. D.Tenn.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 F.2d 604, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sylvester-flowers-and-charlie-mcclendon-ca6-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack