United States v. Sykes
This text of 622 F. App'x 297 (United States v. Sykes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Sykes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for post-judgment discovery. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sykes’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sykes has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Sykes’ motion for appointment of counsel, deny Sykes’ motion for an eviden-tiary hearing, and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sykes-ca4-2015.