United States v. Sykes

Third Circuit

United States v. Sykes

299 F. App'x 119

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 6, 2008

DocketNo. 07-4018

StatusPublished

This text of 299 F. App'x 119 (United States v. Sykes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Sykes, 299 F. App'x 119 (3d Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Marc Sykes, entered into a plea agreement with the Government, whereby he agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute over 50 grams of cocaine and over 500 grams of cocaine powder. The District Court sentenced him to 166 months’ incarceration. We will affirm.

Because we write exclusively for the parties who are familiar with the facts and the proceedings below, we will not revisit them here. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sykes’s counsel has examined the record, concluded that there are no non-frivolous issues for review, and has requested permission to withdraw.

We, too, have thoroughly examined the record and can find no non-frivolous issues to be raised in this appeal. Hence, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Marc Sykes, entered into a plea agreement with the Government, whereby he agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute over 50 grams of cocaine and over 500 grams of cocaine powder. The District Court sentenced him to 166 months’ incarceration. We will affirm.

Because we write exclusively for the parties who are familiar with the facts and the proceedings below, we will not revisit them here. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sykes’s counsel has examined the record, concluded that there are no non-frivolous issues for review, and has requested permission to withdraw.

We, too, have thoroughly examined the record and can find no non-frivolous issues to be raised in this appeal. Hence, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 F. App'x 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sykes-ca3-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack