United States v. Sydney Mittan-Ybarra
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 26-1253
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Sydney Morgan Mittan-Ybarra
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
Submitted: August 3, 2026 Filed: August 6, 2026
[Unpublished]
Before GRASZ, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Sydney Mittan-Ybarra appeals after the district court1 revoked her probation and sentenced her to 12 months and 1 day in prison and 36 months of supervised
1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
release. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion, as the district court properly considered the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, see United States v. Keatings, 787 F.3d 1197, 1202 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review), and imposed a sentence below the statutory limit, see United States v. Tschebaum, 306 F.3d 540, 543-44 (8th Cir. 2002) (upon revocation of probation, district court begins sentencing process anew and may impose any sentence within the statutory limits that would have been available at the initial sentencing); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a) (penalty of not more than 5 years in prison).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sydney Mittan-Ybarra (United States v. Sydney Mittan-Ybarra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.