United States v. Swanson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2006
Docket05-7262
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Swanson (United States v. Swanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Swanson, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY SWANSON, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-95-432)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 3, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Swanson, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Frank Eisinger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Johnny Swanson, III, appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions challenging his conviction and sentence.

Because Swanson’s motions amounted to successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motions for which Swanson failed to obtain authorization

under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) from this court to file, the district

court was without jurisdiction to grant Swanson relief.

Accordingly, we affirm. Swanson’s Motion for Default is denied.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Swanson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-swanson-ca4-2006.