United States v. Sutton
455 F.2d 974
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 1972
DocketNos. 26715, 26717
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 455 F.2d 974 (United States v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Sutton, 455 F.2d 974 (9th Cir. 1972).
Opinion
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
The appellants from material outside the record make a showing that the main prosecuting witness may have testified falsely. This is a matter that can now be the subject of a motion for a new trial. We give no indication as to what the ruling should be.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Paul David Sutton, Lawrence Bernard Graham, Jr.
455 F.2d 974 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
455 F.2d 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sutton-ca9-1972.