United States v. Susan Secomb

37 F.3d 1507, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36318, 1994 WL 515349
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 21, 1994·No. 94-30046·Published

Opinion

37 F.3d 1507
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Susan SECOMB, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-30046.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 1994.*
Decided Sept. 21, 1994.

Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

We are unable to distinguish the facts in this case from those in United States v. Depew, 8 F.3d 1424 (9th Cir.1993), which was decided after the district court's denial of the motion to suppress in this case. Secomb's conviction is therefore REVERSED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Susan Secomb, 37 F.3d 1507, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36318, 1994 WL 515349 (9th Cir. 1994).

37 F.3d 1507 (United States v. Susan Secomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Elzay Depew
8 F.3d 1424 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)