United States v. Susan Secomb

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Susan Secomb

37 F.3d 1507, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36318, 1994 WL 515349

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 21, 1994

Docket94-30046

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1507 (United States v. Susan Secomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Susan Secomb, 37 F.3d 1507, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36318, 1994 WL 515349 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1507
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Susan SECOMB, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-30046.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 1994.*
Decided Sept. 21, 1994.

Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

We are unable to distinguish the facts in this case from those in United States v. Depew, 8 F.3d 1424 (9th Cir.1993), which was decided after the district court's denial of the motion to suppress in this case. Secomb's conviction is therefore REVERSED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI