United States v. Sureties

25 F. Cas. 1354, 1 Dill. 413
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 25 F. Cas. 1354 (United States v. Sureties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sureties, 25 F. Cas. 1354, 1 Dill. 413 (circtdks 1871).

Opinion

DILLON, Circuit Judge.

Bonds or recognizances of this character are binding only when taken in pursuance of law and the order-of a competent court or officer. No order was made authorizing a single bond for $700. and the bond taken was a substantial departure-from the bonds required by the commissioner, and was not therefore obligatory on the sure[1355]*1355ties. State v. Buffum. 2 Fost. (N. H.) 267. Judgment accordingly.

Recognizance 10 secure appearance on criminal charge binding only when in pursuance of order of proper officer. Cited U. S. v. Horton [Case No. 15,393].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County of Merced v. Shaffer
180 P. 342 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
State v. Hines
1913 OK 234 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
City & County of San Francisco v. Hartnett
82 P. 1064 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Thacker v. Woodring
1905 OK 60 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1905)
United States v. Sauer
73 F. 671 (W.D. Texas, 1896)
United States v. Hudson
65 F. 68 (W.D. Arkansas, 1894)
Roberts v. State
34 Kan. 151 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Cas. 1354, 1 Dill. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sureties-circtdks-1871.