United States v. Sureties

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

United States v. Sureties

25 F. Cas. 1354, 1 Dill. 413

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas·Decided July 1, 1871·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

DILLON, Circuit Judge.

Bonds or recognizances of this character are binding only when taken in pursuance of law and the order-of a competent court or officer. No order was made authorizing a single bond for $700. and the bond taken was a substantial departure-from the bonds required by the commissioner, and was not therefore obligatory on the sure[1355]*1355ties. State v. Buffum. 2 Fost. (N. H.) 267. Judgment accordingly.

Recognizance 10 secure appearance on criminal charge binding only when in pursuance of order of proper officer. Cited U. S. v. Horton [Case No. 15,393].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DILLON, Circuit Judge.

Bonds or recognizances of this character are binding only when taken in pursuance of law and the order-of a competent court or officer. No order was made authorizing a single bond for $700. and the bond taken was a substantial departure-from the bonds required by the commissioner, and was not therefore obligatory on the sure[1355]*1355ties. State v. Buffum. 2 Fost. (N. H.) 267. Judgment accordingly.

Recognizance 10 secure appearance on criminal charge binding only when in pursuance of order of proper officer. Cited U. S. v. Horton [Case No. 15,393].

United States v. Sureties, 25 F. Cas. 1354, 1 Dill. 413 (circtdks 1871).

Pincite

25 F. Cas. 1354 (United States v. Sureties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related