United States v. Sumler

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sumler

11 F. App'x 320

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2001·No. 01-6242·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Sumler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sumler, No. CR-96-116 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *321 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Sumler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sumler, No. CR-96-116 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *321 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Sumler, 11 F. App'x 320 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 320 (United States v. Sumler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.