United States v. Sullivan

74 M.J. 317, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 215
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sullivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 M.J. 448
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 15-0186/CG·Published

Opinion

CCA 001-69-13. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT CARRIED ITS BURDEN OF PROVING THAT THE CONVENING AUTHORITY’S CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION OF ALL FLAG OFFICERS WAS HARMLESS.
II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING CHALLENGES FROM BOTH PARTIES TO HIS IMPARTIALITY BASED ON PRIOR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH INDIVIDUAL MILITARY COUNSEL, THE ACCUSED, TRIAL COUNSEL, SEVERAL MEMBERS, SEVERAL WITNESSES, AND THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sullivan, 74 M.J. 317, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 215 (Ark. 2015).

74 M.J. 317 (United States v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.