United States v. Suazo-Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Suazo-Lopez

74 M.J. 325, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 294

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 23, 2015·No. No. 15-0377/NA·Published

Opinion

CCA 201300463. On consideration of the motions to supplement the record, and Appellant’s motions to disqualify Colonel Jamison as government counsel and motion to appoint a special master to develop relevant facts, it is ordered that said motions to supplement the record are hereby granted, and said motion to disqualify Colonel Jamison as counsel and motion to appoint a special master to develop relevant facts are hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 201300463. On consideration of the motions to supplement the record, and Appellant’s motions to disqualify Colonel Jamison as government counsel and motion to appoint a special master to develop relevant facts, it is ordered that said motions to supplement the record are hereby granted, and said motion to disqualify Colonel Jamison as counsel and motion to appoint a special master to develop relevant facts are hereby denied.

United States v. Suazo-Lopez, 74 M.J. 325, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 294 (Ark. 2015).

Pincite

74 M.J. 325 (United States v. Suazo-Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.