United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
This text of 410 U.S. 922 (United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 409 U. S. 1073.] Motion of appellee SCRAP for leave to dispense with printing brief granted. Motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument granted and 15 additional minutes allotted for that purpose. Appellees likewise granted 15 additional minutes for oral argument. Motion of John F. Banzhaf III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee SCRAP granted. Motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
410 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-students-challenging-regulatory-agency-procedures-scotus-1973.