United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures

Supreme Court

United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures

410 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 20, 1973·No. No. 72-535; No. 72-562·Published

Opinion

Appeals from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 409 U. S. 1073.] Motion of appellee SCRAP for leave to dispense with printing brief granted. Motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument granted and 15 additional minutes allotted for that purpose. Appellees likewise granted 15 additional minutes for oral argument. Motion of John F. Banzhaf III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee SCRAP granted. Motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 409 U. S. 1073.] Motion of appellee SCRAP for leave to dispense with printing brief granted. Motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument granted and 15 additional minutes allotted for that purpose. Appellees likewise granted 15 additional minutes for oral argument. Motion of John F. Banzhaf III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee SCRAP granted. Motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. granted.

United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures, 410 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354 (1973).

Pincite

410 U.S. 922 (United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.