United States v. Strong
This text of United States v. Strong (United States v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10931 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
JOE EARL STRONG,
Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-11-1-A -------------------- February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Joe Earl Strong (#13096-077) appeals the district court’s
order that the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised
release run consecutively to a sentence that was to be imposed in
No. 4:98-CR-217-Y for criminal conduct that was the basis of the
revocation. Strong has not shown that the district court’s order
that his revocation sentence run consecutively was plainly
erroneous. See United States v. McCullough, 46 F.3d 400, 401 n.1
(5th Cir. 1995); U.S.S.G. Ch.7, Pt.B, intro. comment.; U.S.S.G.
§ 5G1.3, comment. (n.6). AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Strong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-strong-ca5-2000.