United States v. Stringari

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: August 15, 2025
• Docket: 24-5988
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 15 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5988 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00010-DLC-6 v. MEMORANDUM* JAMES ANDREW STRINGARI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 12, 2025** Anchorage, Alaska

Before: GRABER, OWENS, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Defendant James Andrew Stringari appeals his jury conviction for

conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, controlled

substances (methamphetamine and fentanyl), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). possession with intent to distribute those controlled substances, in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the

prosecution, we hold that a rational trier of fact could have found the essential

elements of the crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Sullivan,

131 F.4th 776, 784 (9th Cir. 2025) (stating standard of review).

Under that standard, the jury reasonably could conclude beyond a reasonable

doubt that Defendant was the middleman in a conspiracy to bring

methamphetamine and fentanyl from California and distribute those drugs in

Montana and that he was guilty of both the crimes charged. Specifically, four

witnesses (Agatha Carranza, Bailey Parker, Trevor Handy, and Cecil Miller)

testified that they saw Defendant personally distribute those drugs. Parker bought

fentanyl from Defendant. All four confirmed that “Esco” (Juan Fuentes) and

Martin Topete were Defendant’s sources. Miller’s texts show that Topete and

Esco referred Miller to Defendant. Handy accompanied Defendant to pick up large

quantities of methamphetamine from Esco and was present when Defendant dealt

drugs to others. As for fentanyl, text messages, which the evidence linked to

Defendant, show that Defendant wanted Topete to receive their next shipment

because he had clients waiting for this product, as well as that Defendant obtained

2 24-5988 firearms for the conspiracy at Topete’s request. Finally, Carranza testified that

Defendant arranged for her to pick up methamphetamine from the post office.

AFFIRMED.

3 24-5988