United States v. Strickland

126 F. App'x 116
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2005·No. 04-7758·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leon Strickland appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for relief from a court-ordered fine. Our review of the record and the district court’s orders discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Strickland, No. CR-98-82 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2004 & Sept. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Strickland, 126 F. App'x 116 (4th Cir. 2005).

126 F. App'x 116 (United States v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.