United States v. Stribling
This text of United States v. Stribling (United States v. Stribling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10627 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GENICE STRIBLING,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-111-3-P --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kevin Ross, the Federal Public Defender appointed to
represent Genice Stribling, has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Stribling has filed a response to Ross’s
motion. Our independent review of the record, Ross’s brief, and
Stribling’s response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, Ross’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, the Federal Public Defender is excused from further
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-10627 -2-
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Stribling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stribling-ca5-2004.