United States v. Striano

Second Circuit

United States v. Striano

434 F.2d 1041

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1970

DocketNo. 341, Docket 35076

StatusPublished

This text of 434 F.2d 1041 (United States v. Striano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Striano, 434 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm, in open court, Philip G. Striano’s conviction for violation of the counterfeiting laws, 18 U.S.C. § 472, as the defense of entrapment presented only a question of fact which was decided by the jury in accordance with a concededly correct charge by the district judge.

The members of the panel have examined the reports of the Secret Service, which were marked Court’s Exhibit A, and find that there was no error in the trial judge’s refusal to permit defense counsel to inspect these reports.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm, in open court, Philip G. Striano’s conviction for violation of the counterfeiting laws, 18 U.S.C. § 472, as the defense of entrapment presented only a question of fact which was decided by the jury in accordance with a concededly correct charge by the district judge.

The members of the panel have examined the reports of the Secret Service, which were marked Court’s Exhibit A, and find that there was no error in the trial judge’s refusal to permit defense counsel to inspect these reports.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

434 F.2d 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-striano-ca2-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack