United States v. Streetman

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Streetman

132 F. App'x 106

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 26, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2215

StatusPublished

This text of 132 F. App'x 106 (United States v. Streetman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Streetman, 132 F. App'x 106 (8th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ray Streetman appeals the sentence the district court¹ imposed after he pleaded guilty to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we agree with counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ray Streetman appeals the sentence the district court¹ imposed after he pleaded guilty to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we agree with counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 F. App'x 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-streetman-ca8-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack