United States v. Streetman
132 F. App'x 106
Opinion
Ray Streetman appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we agree with counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Streetman, 132 F. App'x 106 (8th Cir. 2005).
132 F. App'x 106 (United States v. Streetman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)