United States v. Stowell

First Circuit

United States v. Stowell

75 F. 1023, 20 C.C.A. 681, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedFebruary 12, 1896

DocketNo. 141

StatusPublished

This text of 75 F. 1023 (United States v. Stowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stowell, 75 F. 1023, 20 C.C.A. 681, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093 (1st Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. This was an information for the forfeiture of a distillery owned by Joseph Stowell and Thomas Bevlngton. The judgment of the district court dismissing the information was affirmed by the circuit court, whereupon the United States sued out a writ of error to the supreme court, which court reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings. 133 U. S. 1, 10 Sup. Ct. 244. The district .court rendered a judgment of forfeiture, one-half the costs to be taxed against each of the claimants, respectively. The United States brings error. Before PUTNAM, Circuit Judge, and WEBB, District Judge. No opinion. Dismissed without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. This was an information for the forfeiture of a distillery owned by Joseph Stowell and Thomas Bevlngton. The judgment of the district court dismissing the information was affirmed by the circuit court, whereupon the United States sued out a writ of error to the supreme court, which court reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for further proceedings. 133 U. S. 1, 10 Sup. Ct. 244. The district .court rendered a judgment of forfeiture, one-half the costs to be taxed against each of the claimants, respectively. The United States brings error. Before PUTNAM, Circuit Judge, and WEBB, District Judge. No opinion. Dismissed without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 F. 1023, 20 C.C.A. 681, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stowell-ca1-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack