United States v. Storey

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Storey

695 F. App'x 541

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 16, 2017·No. No. 16-17746 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Kristopher Storey in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgment revoking Storey’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Kristopher Storey in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgment revoking Storey’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Storey, 695 F. App'x 541 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

695 F. App'x 541 (United States v. Storey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related