United States v. Stone & Downer Co.

171 F. 293, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5597
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedMay 11, 1909
DocketNo. 150 (1,833)
StatusPublished

This text of 171 F. 293 (United States v. Stone & Downer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stone & Downer Co., 171 F. 293, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5597 (circtdma 1909).

Opinion

COLT, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed, upon the authority of Boericke & Runyon Company v. United States (C. C.) 126 Fed. 1018. The government contends that the evidence before the Board in the case at bar, is not in accord with the facts presumably found by the court in its opinion in Boericke & Runyon Company v. United States. No such inference, however, can be properly drawn from the opinion of the court in Boericke & Runyon Company v. United States, since an examination of the evidence in that case shows substantially the same state of facts as in the case at bar, and the Board of General Appraisers have expressly found that the merchandise is the same.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boericke & Runyon Co. v. United States
126 F. 1018 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 F. 293, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stone-downer-co-circtdma-1909.