United States v. Stone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7778

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DURWOOD WAYNE STONE, a/k/a Larue Godwin,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-91-106)

Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Durwood Wayne Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Durwood Stone appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion to amend his presentence investigation report. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Stone, No. CR-91-106 (W.D.N.C.

Nov. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED