United States v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & Co.
91 F. 1005, 34 C.C.A. 175, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2102
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 11, 1899·No. No. 267·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
We are fully satisfied with the conclusions of the circuit court (89 Fed. 699) with reference to the ease at bar, and see no occasion to add anything to the opinion given by the learned judge in that court in support of those conclusions. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & Co., 91 F. 1005, 34 C.C.A. 175, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2102 (1st Cir. 1899).
91 F. 1005 (United States v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Ledbetter
267 F. 893 (N.D. Georgia, 1920)
J. B. Ellison & Sons v. United States
142 F. 732 (Third Circuit, 1906)
United States v. Edwin S. Hartwell Lumber Co.
142 F. 432 (Seventh Circuit, 1905)
John B. Ellison & Sons v. United States
136 F. 969 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1905)
Howell v. Bidwell
124 F. 688 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1903)