United States v. Stobaugh

84 F.2d 1019, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 1936
DocketNo. 6871
StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 1019 (United States v. Stobaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stobaugh, 84 F.2d 1019, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815 (6th Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellant’s motion for directed verdict should have been granted because there was no substantial evidence that the insured became totally and permanently disabled while his war risk insurance policy was in force, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and the cause remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F.2d 1019, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stobaugh-ca6-1936.