United States v. Stitt

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Stitt

646 F. App'x 454

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 2016

DocketNo. 14-6158

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 646 F. App'x 454 (United States v. Stitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stitt, 646 F. App'x 454 (6th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 F. App'x 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stitt-ca6-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack