United States v. Stitt

646 F. App'x 454
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2016·No. No. 14-6158·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stitt, 646 F. App'x 454 (6th Cir. 2016).

646 F. App'x 454 (United States v. Stitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Victor Stitt
860 F.3d 854 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Von Cox v. United States
695 F. App'x 851 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Clevis Lofties v. United States
694 F. App'x 996 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Morrison
852 F.3d 488 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)