United States v. Stith
This text of United States v. Stith (United States v. Stith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before HOLIFIELD, HACKEL, and MCCOY Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Anthony D. STITH Master-at-Arms Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202100335
Decided: 2 June 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: M. Christopher Cox
Sentence adjudged 31 August 2021 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 3 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________ United States v. Stith, NMCCA No. 202100335 Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Stith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stith-nmcca-2022.