United States v. Stirewalt
This text of 493 F.2d 1110 (United States v. Stirewalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury convicted Stirewalt of transporting a stolen aircraft in interstate commerce,1 concealing it,2 and having a false registration number painted on it.3 On appeal his sole contention is that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support his conviction.
We find his contention to be without merit. The Government’s evidence showed that the aircraft was stolen from an airport in Orange County, California ; that Stirewalt landed it in Tarrant County, Texas, representing himself to be Dr. Nystrom, the airplane’s true owner; and that Stirewalt employed one Po-plawski to paint a false registration number on the aircraft. Thus there was ample evidence to support Stirewalt’s conviction on all counts. See Barnes v. United States, 1973, 412 U.S. 837, 93 S. Ct. 2357, 37 L.Ed.2d 380; Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S. Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 F.2d 1110, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stirewalt-ca5-1974.