United States v. Stirewalt

493 F.2d 1110, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8738
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 8, 1974·No. No. 73-3938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A jury convicted Stirewalt of transporting a stolen aircraft in interstate commerce,1 concealing it,2 and having a false registration number painted on it.3 On appeal his sole contention is that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support his conviction.

We find his contention to be without merit. The Government’s evidence showed that the aircraft was stolen from an airport in Orange County, California ; that Stirewalt landed it in Tarrant County, Texas, representing himself to be Dr. Nystrom, the airplane’s true owner; and that Stirewalt employed one Po-plawski to paint a false registration number on the aircraft. Thus there was ample evidence to support Stirewalt’s conviction on all counts. See Barnes v. United States, 1973, 412 U.S. 837, 93 S. Ct. 2357, 37 L.Ed.2d 380; Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S. Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stirewalt, 493 F.2d 1110, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8738 (5th Cir. 1974).

493 F.2d 1110 (United States v. Stirewalt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related