United States v. Stiff
This text of United States v. Stiff (United States v. Stiff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40340 Conference Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BILLY JUNE STIFF,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 94-CR-15-1 - - - - - - - - - - (October 18, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
Court-appointed counsel for Billy June Stiff has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
We have independently reviewed counsel's brief, the points raised
by Stiff in response to that brief, and the record, and found no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Stiff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stiff-ca5-1995.