United States v. Stewart

44 F. 483, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 7, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 44 F. 483 (United States v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stewart, 44 F. 483, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1 (southcarolinaed 1891).

Opinion

SimoNtoN, J.

This is an application for witnesses on behalf of Stewart, under section 878, Rev. St., as an indigent person. It appears that an indictment has been given out against Stewart, which is now in the hands of the grand jury. The grand’ jury have not acted on it. The section (878) permits a judge, upon proper'affidavit, to order witnesses to be subpoenaed in behalf of a person indicted; that is to say, after indictment found. If a case be not given to the grand jury, or if they find no bill, the person is not indicted. The section does not apply, and the judge has no authority to order subpoenas at the expense of the United States. Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 F. 483, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stewart-southcarolinaed-1891.