United States v. Stewart
Opinion
Roderick Stewart directly appeals the judgment of the district court1 after he pled guilty to a drug charge and was sentenced to a within-Guidelines-range prison term. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
502 F. App'x 628 (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.