United States v. Stewart

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Stewart

502 F. App'x 628

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 2013

DocketNo. 12-2441

StatusPublished

This text of 502 F. App'x 628 (United States v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stewart, 502 F. App'x 628 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Stewart directly appeals the judgment of the district court¹ after he pled guilty to a drug charge and was sentenced to a within-Guidelines-range prison term. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Stewart directly appeals the judgment of the district court¹ after he pled guilty to a drug charge and was sentenced to a within-Guidelines-range prison term. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 F. App'x 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stewart-ca8-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack