United States v. Stewart

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 F. App'x 291
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2007·No. 05-50995·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-50995 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REBECCA GAYLE STEWART,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-8-2 --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rebecca Gayle Stewart

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Stewart has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our

independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stewart, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Stewart (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)