United States v. Stewart
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 17, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-21061 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARLAND STEWART,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-730-ALL --------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Garland Stewart appeals the revocation of supervised
release on his convictions for conspiring to distribute cocaine and
for distributing cocaine. He seeks to challenge the
constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Because a challenge
under Apprendi is not jurisdictional, he may not present this claim
in an appeal following the revocation of supervised release. See
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States v. Moody, 277 F.3d 719, 720-21 (5th Cir. 2001).
Moreover, as Stewart concedes, his Apprendi argument is foreclosed
by United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Stewart (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.